https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2016/12/14/donald-trump-just-handed-senate-democrats-another-lucky-break/?utm_term=.2b547cd037fe
With an increasingly grim picture for Democrats as Trump chooses more and more cabinet members, the left needs as many breaks as they can get. Trump's appointment of Ryan Zinke greatly increases the chances of Democrats keeping a Montana Senate seat. At this point, every seat is vital. Do you think that Zinke becoming Secretary of the Interior will benefit Senate Democrats? What are other "silver linings" for Democrats from Trump's appointments so far?
Wednesday, December 14, 2016
How Clinton lost Michigan-- and blew the election
http://www.politico.com/story/2016/12/michigan-hillary-clinton-trump-232547
Living in the aftermath of the 2016 presidential election, it is extremely difficult for Democrats and others who don't support President-Elect Trump to cope with the loss, especially as increasingly worrisome appointments are made. Looking back, there is no true way to know what really caused his unexpected victory, but exploring possible reasons for Clinton's loss could help make campaigns more successful in the future. According to the article, what are some possible reasons for the loss? Does hearing more about the campaign process in a state that she eventually lost bring any new reasons to light? How do you think Hillary's campaign could have been more effective?
Living in the aftermath of the 2016 presidential election, it is extremely difficult for Democrats and others who don't support President-Elect Trump to cope with the loss, especially as increasingly worrisome appointments are made. Looking back, there is no true way to know what really caused his unexpected victory, but exploring possible reasons for Clinton's loss could help make campaigns more successful in the future. According to the article, what are some possible reasons for the loss? Does hearing more about the campaign process in a state that she eventually lost bring any new reasons to light? How do you think Hillary's campaign could have been more effective?
Obama, paying tribute to Biden and bipartisanship, signs 21st Century Cures Act Tuesday
Obama, paying tribute to Biden and bipartisanship, signs 21st Century Cures Act Tuesday
This article is about President Obama who recently signed a bill into that aims to increase funding for medical research, speed the development and approval of experimental treatments, and overhaul federal policy on mental health care. This legislation passed with wide bipartisan support, and it highlights that politicians can still come together and make policies that help the American people. However, critics of this bill claim that the expedited pathway for approving new drugs could harm patients. If the new drugs are not proven to work and are potentially unsafe but have passed the regulations, there could be many negative consequences on patients.
Do you agree with these critics? Should the regulations on new drugs be stricter even if it means that they will come out more slowly? The previous version of this bill stalled in the Senate for more than a year, what do you think was different this time?
This article is about President Obama who recently signed a bill into that aims to increase funding for medical research, speed the development and approval of experimental treatments, and overhaul federal policy on mental health care. This legislation passed with wide bipartisan support, and it highlights that politicians can still come together and make policies that help the American people. However, critics of this bill claim that the expedited pathway for approving new drugs could harm patients. If the new drugs are not proven to work and are potentially unsafe but have passed the regulations, there could be many negative consequences on patients.
Do you agree with these critics? Should the regulations on new drugs be stricter even if it means that they will come out more slowly? The previous version of this bill stalled in the Senate for more than a year, what do you think was different this time?
Senate and House Leaders Call for Inquiry of Russian Hacking in Election
Senate and House Leaders Call for Inquiry of Russian Hacking in Election
This article addresses the recent investigations regarding the possibility of Russian cyberattacks that might have influenced the election. Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell and Speak of the House Paul Ryan have both condemned any such efforts and have urged Democrats and Republicans to work together to support the investigation. This response from the two top Republicans in Congress could also foreshadow tension between Republicans in Congress and the president-elect, who has mocked theses findings. Furthermore, Hillary Clinton’s campaign chairman and many other Democrats have called for the CIA to release what they know about the hacking and claim that the Russian interference was solely to get Trump elected.
Do you think Trump had anything to do with the Russian cyberattacks considering their relationship? What do you think will happen as a result of this investigation? Do you think the Electoral College will change their vote once more information is released?
This article addresses the recent investigations regarding the possibility of Russian cyberattacks that might have influenced the election. Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell and Speak of the House Paul Ryan have both condemned any such efforts and have urged Democrats and Republicans to work together to support the investigation. This response from the two top Republicans in Congress could also foreshadow tension between Republicans in Congress and the president-elect, who has mocked theses findings. Furthermore, Hillary Clinton’s campaign chairman and many other Democrats have called for the CIA to release what they know about the hacking and claim that the Russian interference was solely to get Trump elected.
Do you think Trump had anything to do with the Russian cyberattacks considering their relationship? What do you think will happen as a result of this investigation? Do you think the Electoral College will change their vote once more information is released?
Tuesday, December 13, 2016
Scientists are frantically copying U.S. climate data, fearing it might vanish under Trump
On the topic of climate change and president elect Trump's appointment nominee for the head of the EPA, this article describes the efforts of scientists to preserve their research before it disappears. Throughout this "guerilla archiving" process, many have begun fearing an almost 1984-esque future, in which Trump's cabinet with eradicate recent data on climate change in the US in order to further solidify their idea that it indeed does not exist. Others maintian the belief that they will instead be forced to end the collection of data, reducing its credibility by reducing the visible trends throughout the years.
Do you feel that this is an overexaggeration? Or does this seem like less and less of a stretch? Is the left wing consistantly digging for dirt to soil the name of our president elect? Is he not as bad as the liberal media makes him seem? So far, many of Trump's nominees have seemed like the polar opposites to their respective offices. Do you think this is an exaggeration as well, in which his candidates hold more merit than the media gives them credit for? Or are the only good things coming out of this election's results easy topics for Gov Blogs and SNL Skits?
Do you feel that this is an overexaggeration? Or does this seem like less and less of a stretch? Is the left wing consistantly digging for dirt to soil the name of our president elect? Is he not as bad as the liberal media makes him seem? So far, many of Trump's nominees have seemed like the polar opposites to their respective offices. Do you think this is an exaggeration as well, in which his candidates hold more merit than the media gives them credit for? Or are the only good things coming out of this election's results easy topics for Gov Blogs and SNL Skits?
George W Bush's Environment Chief slams Donald Trump for appointing climate change denier to run EPA
In this article, former head of the EPA Christine Todd Whitman give some choice words and very strong opinions regarding president elect Trump's own appointment, Scott Pruitt. She expresses to readers that she has "[never] seen an appointment of someone who is so disdainful of the agency and the science behind what the agency does". Pruitt, who has been quoted stating that climate change is "subject to considerable debate", is known to have close ties with the fossil fuel company.
Ignoring your own personal opinons about climate change, do you feel that, as Whitman fears, this appointment will cause many experienced staff to leave? Or can the bureaucracy rise up and slow down whatever Pruitt tries to put into action? Will they even need to? Do you think that Trump has some logic in his appointments, or is he being influenced by outside forces? Is he actually just pulling names out of a "Make America Great Again" hat filled with the names of his top donators?
Ignoring your own personal opinons about climate change, do you feel that, as Whitman fears, this appointment will cause many experienced staff to leave? Or can the bureaucracy rise up and slow down whatever Pruitt tries to put into action? Will they even need to? Do you think that Trump has some logic in his appointments, or is he being influenced by outside forces? Is he actually just pulling names out of a "Make America Great Again" hat filled with the names of his top donators?
A Trump Economic Boom? The Fed May Stand in the Way
A Trump Economic Boom? The Fed May Stand in the Way
This article discusses Trump's plan for the economy and how his plan may affect the country. Trump has been pretty vague in these plans, but from what he has said, he wants to raise the economy much more than what is sustainable. Trump has gone back on his word a few times already though, so do you think that he will carry through with his plans? What do you think he should focus on the most in the regards to the economy? What do you think of these plans?
This article discusses Trump's plan for the economy and how his plan may affect the country. Trump has been pretty vague in these plans, but from what he has said, he wants to raise the economy much more than what is sustainable. Trump has gone back on his word a few times already though, so do you think that he will carry through with his plans? What do you think he should focus on the most in the regards to the economy? What do you think of these plans?
Reid: FBI director's letter cost Democrats the election, Senate
Reid: FBI director's letter cost Democrats the election, Senate
This article is about Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid saying the head of the FBI was the reason that Hillary Clinton did not win the election. According to Reid if it weren't for him, not only would Hillary Clinton be president but Democrats would have won at least two more Senate seats. Russian hacking in this election and how the government has been handling it has been in the news a lot lately. Do you believe Reid's allegations? Do you think that one person could have such an impact on the government in general?
This article is about Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid saying the head of the FBI was the reason that Hillary Clinton did not win the election. According to Reid if it weren't for him, not only would Hillary Clinton be president but Democrats would have won at least two more Senate seats. Russian hacking in this election and how the government has been handling it has been in the news a lot lately. Do you believe Reid's allegations? Do you think that one person could have such an impact on the government in general?
Wednesday, November 30, 2016
Trump falsely claims 'millions of people who voted illegally' cost him popular vote
By now, we all have probably heard of or seen Trump's tweets about how illegal votes cost him the popular vote in the election. This is the first time he's blamed voter fraud on his own victory, even though there is no evidence. He has also stated that the recount efforts, led by the Green Party, are a scam, and he has had contradictory views on the Electoral College. It is undeniable that Trump is active on Twitter, and that he is very responsive on the app.
What do you think about Trump's tweeting habits, and what do they say about the future president? Do you think his tweets have any kind of influence over his supporters? Do you think his tweeting will change once he's in office? Why or why not?
What do you think about Trump's tweeting habits, and what do they say about the future president? Do you think his tweets have any kind of influence over his supporters? Do you think his tweeting will change once he's in office? Why or why not?
Voting rights advocates brace for ‘biggest fight of our lifetime’ during Trump administration
This article is about the effect Donald Trump has left on voting rights advocates, and how his recent tweets and statements have angered advocates into wondering if Trump's new administration will make it harder for certain groups of people to vote. They have already had to fight numerous battles concerning certain states revoking voter eligibility for reasons such as voter inactivity and proof of I.D. Advocates are frustrated and worried that with all the claims of voter fraud in the country, laws could be put into place to make voting more difficult.
Are voter rights advocates right to worry about the future of voting in elections? What can they do to prevent laws from going into place that restrict voting? Do you think that they can win the battle against voter fraud alarm in America?
Tuesday, November 29, 2016
After Democrats' Losses, Nancy Pelosi Becomes a Symbol of What Went Wrong
Nancy Pelosi Becomesa Symbol of What Went Wrong
This article addresses the concerns surrounding Nancy Pelosi's place as Democratic minority leader in the House. She has held the position for ten year (2003-2007, 2010-present) and has also served as House Minority Whip and Speaker of the House. Pelosi, a progressive from San Francisco, is being challenged by Tim Ryan from northeastern Ohio. Some politicians feel that it's time for new blood to recapture the working-class voters and regain Congressional dominance, but most feel Ryan isn't the person to do so. What are the benefits and disadvantages of keeping Pelosi? Which person will ultimately strengthen the Democratic party in Congress? Does it say anything that there's opposition for this title?
This article addresses the concerns surrounding Nancy Pelosi's place as Democratic minority leader in the House. She has held the position for ten year (2003-2007, 2010-present) and has also served as House Minority Whip and Speaker of the House. Pelosi, a progressive from San Francisco, is being challenged by Tim Ryan from northeastern Ohio. Some politicians feel that it's time for new blood to recapture the working-class voters and regain Congressional dominance, but most feel Ryan isn't the person to do so. What are the benefits and disadvantages of keeping Pelosi? Which person will ultimately strengthen the Democratic party in Congress? Does it say anything that there's opposition for this title?
Steven Mnuchin is Donald Trump's Expected Choice for Treasury Secretary
Steven Mnuchin is Donald Trump's Expected Choice for Treasury Secretary
It's been rumored that Mnuchin, the national finance chairman for the Trump campaign, will be the Treasury secretary. He could play a role in enacting economic policy changes, such as a large amount of tax cuts, changes to foreign trade agreements, and the fulfillment of a huge new infrastructure spending program. He's a Washington outsider but has a history with Trump. His hedge fund was sued by Trump in 2008, not to mention the fact that he started out with Goldman Sachs, an organization Trump publicly denounced during the election. Do you think Steven Mnuchin is a smart choice after reading about his past experience? What does Trump's consideration of someone who works for a company that "robbed our working class" show about his own judgement and character?
Trump on Flag Burning
Trump: Burn the flag, go to jail
President-elect Donald Trump proposed a penalty for those who burn the American Flag, which could include jail time or possibly even a loss of citizenship. Regardless of two US Supreme Court rulings protecting the act as a form of freedom of speech, Trump still believes anyone who burns the flag must be punished. Trump supports the first amendment which grants citizens freedom of speech but he believes there to be a huge difference between burning the flag and freedom of speech.mTrump tweeted early this morning, "Nobody should be allowed to burn the American flag - if they do, there must be consequences - perhaps loss of citizenship or year in jail!" This tweet acquired a lot of mainstream support as it gained several thousand retweets in the matter of a day. Do you agree with Donald Trump? Do you think Trump will make an attempt to implement a law in regards to burning the American flag?
President-elect Donald Trump proposed a penalty for those who burn the American Flag, which could include jail time or possibly even a loss of citizenship. Regardless of two US Supreme Court rulings protecting the act as a form of freedom of speech, Trump still believes anyone who burns the flag must be punished. Trump supports the first amendment which grants citizens freedom of speech but he believes there to be a huge difference between burning the flag and freedom of speech.mTrump tweeted early this morning, "Nobody should be allowed to burn the American flag - if they do, there must be consequences - perhaps loss of citizenship or year in jail!" This tweet acquired a lot of mainstream support as it gained several thousand retweets in the matter of a day. Do you agree with Donald Trump? Do you think Trump will make an attempt to implement a law in regards to burning the American flag?
Trump Plans to Repeal Obamacare
Tom Price, Obamacare Critic, Is Trump’s Choice for Health Secretary
President-elect Donald Trump intends to repeal Obamacare as one of his first acts in office. As a result, Trump says he plans to nominate Georgia Representative Tom Price, an Obamacare opponent who has been prepared for six years, as head of the Department of Health and Human Services. Being an orthopedic surgeon, Price has always been strongly opposed to Obamacare, claiming it has hiked premiums and limited access to doctors. The legislation Price has proposed, the Empowering Patients First Act, would repeal the Affordable Care Act and offer age-adjusted tax credits for the purchase of individual and family health insurance policies. Price has also favored legislations to bar federal funds for planned parenthood. Many democrats feel that the ideas proposed by Tom Price strongly favor the wealthy and do a disservice to the poor. Do you think it's a good idea to repeal Obamacare? Why or why not? Do you think Trump will follow through with this?
President-elect Donald Trump intends to repeal Obamacare as one of his first acts in office. As a result, Trump says he plans to nominate Georgia Representative Tom Price, an Obamacare opponent who has been prepared for six years, as head of the Department of Health and Human Services. Being an orthopedic surgeon, Price has always been strongly opposed to Obamacare, claiming it has hiked premiums and limited access to doctors. The legislation Price has proposed, the Empowering Patients First Act, would repeal the Affordable Care Act and offer age-adjusted tax credits for the purchase of individual and family health insurance policies. Price has also favored legislations to bar federal funds for planned parenthood. Many democrats feel that the ideas proposed by Tom Price strongly favor the wealthy and do a disservice to the poor. Do you think it's a good idea to repeal Obamacare? Why or why not? Do you think Trump will follow through with this?
Meet Tim Ryan, the Ohio Democrat challenging Nancy Pelosi to lead House Democrats
This article concerns the leadership and direction of the Democratic Party going forward. Ohio Democratic Representative Tim Ryan plans to run against current House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi for her position. Although he did not plan to originally run against her, he changed his mind after Donald Trump won his home town in Ohio (and generally swept Democratic strongholds in the Midwest as a whole). Ryan is clearly not expected to win his bid, as only a few Democrats have publicly supported him. Still, he says he is withing "striking distance."
During the recent election date, Democrats under performed expectations in House and Senate races, as well as the Presidency. Obama prevailed in Ryan's home county of Trumbull County by 23 points, while Trump recently won by 7. Do you think it is time for the Democrats to turn to new leadership to give the party a new face (that is more relatable to a broader base)? Or are you of the belief that now is the time for Democrats to stay united in the face of crushing defeats? Would substantial support for Ryan, even if he loses, signify a division in the Democratic Party?
During the recent election date, Democrats under performed expectations in House and Senate races, as well as the Presidency. Obama prevailed in Ryan's home county of Trumbull County by 23 points, while Trump recently won by 7. Do you think it is time for the Democrats to turn to new leadership to give the party a new face (that is more relatable to a broader base)? Or are you of the belief that now is the time for Democrats to stay united in the face of crushing defeats? Would substantial support for Ryan, even if he loses, signify a division in the Democratic Party?
Texas Presidential Elector can’t Vote for Donald Trump, Resigns
This article discusses the decision by an Electoral College voter to resign from his post. Art Sisneros, a welding supply salesman, was chosen to be one of 38 electors to represent the Texas Republican slate during the Republican state convention in May. Although he signed a pledge to support the Republican nominee with his vote, Mr. Sisneros has decided that he would rather resign from his post. He cites his belief that "voting for Trump would bring dishonor to God," as justification for his decision. He also believes it to be an alternative to becoming a "faithless elector," who is a person who votes for another candidate rather than their party's nominee.
In class we discussed the pros and cons of the electoral college system currently in place. Do you believe that Mr. Sisneros has an obligation to vote for Mr. Trump, or do you believe resigning is justified? Keep in mind that the remaining electors are almost certain to choose a supporter or Mr. Trump as a replacement for Mr. Sisneros. To take things farther, should Mr. Sisneros respond to calls from many voters who cite Secretary Clinton's lead in the popular vote and vote for a candidate besides Mr. Trump? Finally, what do you expect the public's reaction to this decision to be?
In class we discussed the pros and cons of the electoral college system currently in place. Do you believe that Mr. Sisneros has an obligation to vote for Mr. Trump, or do you believe resigning is justified? Keep in mind that the remaining electors are almost certain to choose a supporter or Mr. Trump as a replacement for Mr. Sisneros. To take things farther, should Mr. Sisneros respond to calls from many voters who cite Secretary Clinton's lead in the popular vote and vote for a candidate besides Mr. Trump? Finally, what do you expect the public's reaction to this decision to be?
Saturday, November 26, 2016
Romney said to be serious about secretary of state job
Donald Trump is considering Mitt Romney as a possible candidate for the Secretary of State position. Trump and Romney met at Trump's Golf Retreat to discuss the possibility of him getting the position, and since then it has been confirmed by Mike Pence that Romney is under active consideration for the position. What do you think about Mitt Romney being the possible Secretary of State? Remeber, Trump and Romney have not always had the best relationship this year, having verbal disputes over the course of the campaign.
Donald Trump is considering Mitt Romney as a possible candidate for the Secretary of State position. Trump and Romney met at Trump's Golf Retreat to discuss the possibility of him getting the position, and since then it has been confirmed by Mike Pence that Romney is under active consideration for the position. What do you think about Mitt Romney being the possible Secretary of State? Remeber, Trump and Romney have not always had the best relationship this year, having verbal disputes over the course of the campaign.
Donald Trump blasts recount as "ridiculous" and "a scam"
Donald Trump is heavily criticizing Jill Stein in her effort to raise money for a recount in the state of Wisconsin for the presidential election, which should take place next week. Trump is calling this a scam that is raising money for her party that will not even go towards a recount, although she has stated that all of the money raised is going to an account soley for the purpose of the recount. Stein has already raised $5 million for the recount. He is also saying it is a waste, as Clinton has already conceeded the election to him. What do you think about this? What do you think about Trump's opinion? Is there a reason for this recount?
Donald Trump is heavily criticizing Jill Stein in her effort to raise money for a recount in the state of Wisconsin for the presidential election, which should take place next week. Trump is calling this a scam that is raising money for her party that will not even go towards a recount, although she has stated that all of the money raised is going to an account soley for the purpose of the recount. Stein has already raised $5 million for the recount. He is also saying it is a waste, as Clinton has already conceeded the election to him. What do you think about this? What do you think about Trump's opinion? Is there a reason for this recount?
Wednesday, November 23, 2016
'Hamilton' boos at Mike Pence
https://www.google.com/amp/amp.usatoday.com/story/94113080/?client=safari
In this article, they give videos, quotes and tweets referencing the Hamilton show where the audience had yelled things at the new Vice President Mike Pence. These tweets and quotes are of Trump saying the cast needs to apologize to Pence. He has sent out various tweets saying how the behavior there was in aprpriate and made a theater unsafe where it should be a "special and safe place" to go. While Trump is demanding for apologies, Pence is saying it's their right to express their opinions. What do you think about the audience booing Pence, is it the casts' fault? Is Trump overreacting or getting too involved? How do you think Pence is reacting?
Tuesday, November 22, 2016
Obama Reacting To Trump In Office
https://www.google.com/amp/townhall.com/tipsheet/mattvespa/2016/11/21/obama-once-i-leave-office-im-probably-going-to-help-democrats-oppose-trump-n2248559%3Famp%3Dtrue?client=safari
This article talks about Obama's reaction to Donald Trump being elected as the new President of the United States. After finishing his final term, Barack Obama says he's going to help and encourage democrats to oppose Trump as their president as best he can. He feels as though he needs to stay within the race because he failed his party, promising to help Hillary win. Are you sirpised by your current president's reaction? Do. You think his actions are inappropriate as a future ex-president?
This article talks about Obama's reaction to Donald Trump being elected as the new President of the United States. After finishing his final term, Barack Obama says he's going to help and encourage democrats to oppose Trump as their president as best he can. He feels as though he needs to stay within the race because he failed his party, promising to help Hillary win. Are you sirpised by your current president's reaction? Do. You think his actions are inappropriate as a future ex-president?
Monday, November 21, 2016
Trump Adviser Kris Kobach Accidentally Shows Immigration Ideas
"Trump adviser accidentally reveals border wall, immigrant-tracking"
Recently, a photo of Trump and Kansas Secretary of State Kris Kobach was taken in which the documents in Kobach's hand can be read by looking closely. These documents contained notes on a meeting between Kobach and Trump discussing immigration. Among the notes were mentions of deportation, the patriot act, refugees, and of course, the wall. There were rumors floating around that the wall wouldn't be built and that Trump isn't really that strict on immigration, but this photo gives evidence against those rumors. The policies and ideas represented in the documents show very strict immigration policies and live up to exactly what Trump was campaigning for. How do you think people who may have thought he wasn't being completely serious will react to this? Do you think this is concrete evidence of the wall, or may he still change his mind? How do you think the public will react since the documents had mention of the controversial patriot act? Do you think his ideas are too extreme to get support, or are they just extreme enough?
Recently, a photo of Trump and Kansas Secretary of State Kris Kobach was taken in which the documents in Kobach's hand can be read by looking closely. These documents contained notes on a meeting between Kobach and Trump discussing immigration. Among the notes were mentions of deportation, the patriot act, refugees, and of course, the wall. There were rumors floating around that the wall wouldn't be built and that Trump isn't really that strict on immigration, but this photo gives evidence against those rumors. The policies and ideas represented in the documents show very strict immigration policies and live up to exactly what Trump was campaigning for. How do you think people who may have thought he wasn't being completely serious will react to this? Do you think this is concrete evidence of the wall, or may he still change his mind? How do you think the public will react since the documents had mention of the controversial patriot act? Do you think his ideas are too extreme to get support, or are they just extreme enough?
Protecting Trump Costs Over $1 Million a Day
"Protecting Donald Trump costs New York City more than $1 million a day"
This article discusses how protecting Donald Trump, while he continues to live in Trump Tower, is costing NYC over $1 million a day. Until inauguration, Trump plans to continue living in NYC, where his children and grandchildren also live, who are also receiving protection. This is the first time a president has been in a big city so often, so the costs are unprecedented. Trump even plans on splitting time between DC amd NYC during his presidency, which will naturally raise the costs even higher. What effect do you think this will have on Trump beginning his presidency? Do you think people will understand his need to be at home, or is the White House supposed to be the new home for the president? How do you think Trump will try to fix this, or will he just ignore it?
This article discusses how protecting Donald Trump, while he continues to live in Trump Tower, is costing NYC over $1 million a day. Until inauguration, Trump plans to continue living in NYC, where his children and grandchildren also live, who are also receiving protection. This is the first time a president has been in a big city so often, so the costs are unprecedented. Trump even plans on splitting time between DC amd NYC during his presidency, which will naturally raise the costs even higher. What effect do you think this will have on Trump beginning his presidency? Do you think people will understand his need to be at home, or is the White House supposed to be the new home for the president? How do you think Trump will try to fix this, or will he just ignore it?
Donald Trump Met Privately With Network Executives And Anchors
Donald Trump Met Privately With Network Executives And Anchors
This article discusses how president elect Donald Trump has placed "unprecedented constraints" on how the press will work during his presidency, likely similar to those he placed on the press during his campaign. The exact conversation was off the record, so no journalists could report exact quotes of what happened, but the article basically discusses how strange it is that a president who hasn't even been inaugurated yet is already meeting "both network bosses and top on-air talent", when it was revealed that Mr. Trump hasn't even held a press conference since the summer.
Trump, as we've discussed in these blogs, has been called the next Hitler, a dictator, and all sorts of things. Do you think this idea of limiting the press contributes to that idea? Furthermore, is Mr. Trump even allowed, by law, to limit people. We live in the United States of America, where free speech is listed in our first ammendment. If people are so up in arms (no pun intended) already about gun rights possibly being altered, how do you supposse they'll react to possibly limited speech/even more limited information?
San Antonio police say attacker who killed officer was targeting ‘the uniform’
"2016 'has been an especially dangerous year for police officers, with a significant increase in the number of officers killed in the line of duty since Jan. 1.'"
This article discusses multiple recent shootings in which police were targeted, one of them while standing outside writing a parking ticket, the others while sitting in their cars. These shootings occured just hours apart, and relatively close to one another. Authorities are currently debating whether or not these incidents were at all linked, or if the shooter had any motive for his targets, besides their being police officers. However,the title of the article comes from one of the targeted officers, McManus, who remarked, “I think the uniform was the target, and anyone, the first person who happened along, was the person that he targeted." The he in this case was "a black man in his 20s".
I believe that the current state of affairs between police and citizens is awful. Reflect on this. First, do you think it was simply the "uniform" that was targeted, or do you think it was something more? Additionally, you may choose to respond to the idea that "The Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence said that the shootings illustrated a need for stronger background checks to “to keep guns out of the hands of people who shouldn’t have them” as a way to keep officers safe." Personally, I agree that we need stronger background checks, but for more than just keeping our officers safe. Whether or not you agree with this campaign's sentiment, suggest what reforms you think our law enforcemnt should adopt in an attempt to end this citizen/police struggle. Do you think its necessary that our law enforcement changes its ways before we, the citizens, change ours?
Wednesday, October 26, 2016
Trump Spent More on Hats Than Polling
Trump has spent $1.8 million on polling and $15.3 million on collateral (hats, signs, shirts) from June 2015- September 2016. His campaign strategy was to spend more on hats than on field consulting for a large portion of his campaign. It wasn't until September of 2016 that he started spending more on ads (roughly two thirds of his total campaign budget). Do you think this was an effective campaign strategy? How does Trump's campaign compare to Clinton's? Do you think the outcome of this election will be largely impacted by this?
Nightmare Election for Female Republicans
Women of the Republican Party are struggling with the defense and fallout of of their party nominee. Some of the conservative women defend him and his misogynistic comments while other struggle with the fact that they have to push back against their party. This is not a normal election, and many women of the Republican Party don't want viewers to think that Trump speaks for the entire party. Most of the Republican women speaking out against Trump's sexism are getting a lot of hate and negative feedback. Many think that after the 2016 election, there will be feud in the Republican Party over issues like sexism and racism. Also, interviews with conservative women solely regard their thoughts on Trump's most recent sexist comment or allegation, rather than policy or their thoughts on the other presidential candidate. What do you think about the Republicans who are speaking against their party nominee? How do you think this election will effect women in the Republican Party?
Tuesday, October 25, 2016
Electional Law... Ceding the Election?
Electional Law Doesn't Care
"I guess we'll have to wait for November 8th to see if Trump decides to wipe his a&& with the Constitution!" exclaimed a fiery Stephen Colbert recently after Trump's promise to keep the country in suspense over whether he'd accept the results of the election. (Don't worry, he absolutely will*).
*assuming he wins.
Don't worry, though, there's no need for a concession speech by either candidate, legally. The Founders had a sneaking suspicion we'd get a few sore losers along the way, and made it not a problem.
Knowing what you now know about the actual laws, consider the campaign we've witnessed. Think about Trump and Clinton's respective fan bases and consider what they will feel about the results of the election. We can safely assume Clinton will win, so what do you think happens if Trump doesn't cede the election? What will his supporters do? Will we still have a country? Who showed me how to use the italics feature??
Why do bad things happen to good people?!
I Had a Scary Dream About Trump
"I Had a Scary Dream About Trump"
"Those who do not remember history are condemned to repeat it"
Many who have tried to compare the current election cycle to history are met with an uncomfortable reality. Call Donald Trump a demagogue and face the wrath of conservatives everywhere who can't stomach a Hillary Clinton presidency (for various reasons). You'll be accused of over simplifying, or told that you're equating everyone you don't like to Hitler. Fail to address Donald Trump as such and not only will you draw ire from liberals, you'll be aiding the desensitization of this country to such foreign concepts as Donald Trump and many of his supporters.
Still, awkward as it may be to discuss, this election reeks of demagoguery. With sotto voce anti-Semitic speech from Trump and especially his supporters (many of whom represent broad coalitions of white supremacist groups from #AllLivesMatter to the actual KKK) we begin to draw some pretty strong parallel between Trump and Hitler. Trump's proposal of a Muslim ban and tests on their faith would be unlike anything the United States has ever seen, but not unlike anything the world has ever seen.
Consider the human impact of Trump, his speech, and the kind of speech he encourages. Consider whether comparing Trump and Hitler is fair, or if it's just the sort of anti-Trump propaganda any idiot could make online. Consider perhaps other historical figures more aptly compared to Donald's campaign.
"Those who do not remember history are condemned to repeat it"
Many who have tried to compare the current election cycle to history are met with an uncomfortable reality. Call Donald Trump a demagogue and face the wrath of conservatives everywhere who can't stomach a Hillary Clinton presidency (for various reasons). You'll be accused of over simplifying, or told that you're equating everyone you don't like to Hitler. Fail to address Donald Trump as such and not only will you draw ire from liberals, you'll be aiding the desensitization of this country to such foreign concepts as Donald Trump and many of his supporters.
Still, awkward as it may be to discuss, this election reeks of demagoguery. With sotto voce anti-Semitic speech from Trump and especially his supporters (many of whom represent broad coalitions of white supremacist groups from #AllLivesMatter to the actual KKK) we begin to draw some pretty strong parallel between Trump and Hitler. Trump's proposal of a Muslim ban and tests on their faith would be unlike anything the United States has ever seen, but not unlike anything the world has ever seen.
Consider the human impact of Trump, his speech, and the kind of speech he encourages. Consider whether comparing Trump and Hitler is fair, or if it's just the sort of anti-Trump propaganda any idiot could make online. Consider perhaps other historical figures more aptly compared to Donald's campaign.
Trump ends big-money fundraisers that were boosting GOP
This article is about how Donald Trump has scheduled no more high-dollar fundraisers between now and the election. The campaign is still raising a lot of money thanks to online donations and other RNC members who are fundraising for the entire GOP ticket. Trump's financial chairman said that they want to focus on talking to voters instead of holding these fundraising events. The Trump campaign says they are raising enough money online, but only 20% of online donations go to the RNC. What does this decisions show about the relationship between Trump and the RNC, if anything? Do you think this will prove to be an effective strategy?
Millennials Go for Clinton
This article is about how Hillary Clinton has been appealing to millennials, especially since the first debate. It discusses how hard Clinton's campaign has worked to appeal to this age group. The article includes quotes from a lot of students about what it is about Clinton that has caused them to support her. Factors such as her toughness, confidence, focus on family issues, and lack of tolerance towards Donald Trump are all cited as appealing qualities about Clinton. It's clear that Clinton will never have the same response from millennials as Obama or Sanders, but what she has now should be enough for her to secure the vote from this demographic. Do you agree with the quote from Clinton's campaign manager that "Secretary Clinton is going to win this campaign because of millennial voters"? A lot of the people in the article were former Sanders supporters. How much of an impact do you think Sanders' endorsement of Clinton has had on the amount of millennials who now support her?
The Political Environment on Social Media
There has been a particularly large amount of social media activity surrounding this election season. Some users of social media have found this amount of activity helpful in facilitating political activism and engagement, while others are "worn out" from this unpleasant and unproductive saturation. Also, some view the tone and manner in which this activity is conducted to be harmful. This type of activity is most prevalent on Facebook and Twitter. Users have taken steps to ignore and block what they view as "angry and disrespectful" political discussions. This frustration occurs across the entirety of the political spectrum. What role do you think social media has in the political process? Do you personally see more political activity on social media from one side of the political spectrum? Do you enjoy the amount of political discussion on your feed, or are you frustrated with it?
Why politicians lie
There has been a lot of discussion of lying and deception during this election season. While this election is unique in a lot of ways, it is not the first to include lying politicians. This article examines some reasons behind these lies. In order to facilitate deals, politicians may have to keep private views and public views separate. Politicians may also take advantage of public ignorance by lying about details of policies, overstating benefits and understating costs, or lying about ones own past. For example, Obama and Dick Cheney concealed their private support of same-sex marriage until public and political attitudes shifted. The article gives examples of several other Republicans and Democrats who have participated in lying throughout campaign cycles. Do you think lying is an inevitable and necessary part of the political process for candidates to achieve success? Is it an ethical political strategy? Do you believe their are any current politicians or present/former candidates innocent of lying?
Tuesday, October 18, 2016
These women have accused Trump of sexual harassment
8 women have steppesing Donald Trump for sexual harassment. It seems to be all of a sudden. This events happened mainly at Trump Tower and night clubs, one even on a plane. These women seem to be pretty serious about their reports, saying he groped them, aggressively kissing by force and more. No matter who this is, it's a disgusting g thing to do. Now do you believe everything the women are saying or do you think there's a possibly chance they're just trying to get attention and throw dirt on Trump. Trump has denied most of the actions.
Donald Trump's 'Rigged Election' Claims Raise Historical Alarms
This article talks about how a trump believes voter fraud is a huge problem. Saying the only way he would lose Pennsylvania is because of voter fraud. As stated in the article, Trump did say if he lost he would support Clinton, but his answer has changed; "We'll have to wait and see." It sounds to me that Trump is afraid is losing the election and wants to blame voter fraud on his possibly chances of losing. Do you think voter fraud is a severe problem? Do you think Trump will fully support Clinton if he loses the election? Why?
Monday, October 17, 2016
Leaked Hillary Clinton Emails: Could Bernie Sanders Have Won Primary If Leak Occurred Earlier?
I think that while this is not as important to me as the other issues, I do think that it is quite important to some people who really did want Bernie initially. This could be very important to the current race, as I believe that if the choice was Bernie or Trump, the country would undoubtedly pick Bernie. People are not so trusting as of now in Hillary. On CNN just now I saw that Trump is 13 point up in Ohio with Married Women. If Trump can turn things around enough through diversion, no matter how distasteful that thought might be, he could bring a pretty damn close race.
Report from Standing Rock: 100+ Militarized Police Deployed Against Native American Water Protectors
For a couple of weeks now, the protesters have been attempting to stop the Dakota Access Pipeline. This is one of the newest developments where protesters at Standing Rock were praying and being interviewed by Democracy Now! for the reasons they came to the pipeline. Reasons ranged between, in an effort to save the water, as one woman came from Michigan, others simply for the continuity of native generations coming from Native Reservations. There was a blockade of the road by the police, armed with batons, and rifles in riot gear along with national guardsmen. What do you think of these protester's pleading to pray for the land? What do you think about the way they were responded to by law enforcement?
Saturday, October 15, 2016
Is Donald Trump Good for Women?
Put down your torches and pitchforks, ladies and gentlemen. I know what I'm saying.
One of the largest blows to Donald Trump's campaign (and there were many blows) was the resurfacing of an eleven-year-old tape in which Trump "essentially admits he has a habit of sexually assaulting women." This brings the topic of sexual assault and the way in which we as a society address it into the political spectrum yet again. The article describes the wide-spread effects of Law Professor Anita Hill's testifying against Justice Clarence Thomas that he had sexually harassed her. It also cites the story of the many brave women who last year stepped forward to tell their stories of being sexually assaulted by Bill Cosby. Both events succeeded overwhelmingly in galvanizing women. If that were the case then, imagine now. "Perhaps Trump is the ultimate gift to feminists: a grabber and bragger who has focused the world’s attention on the outrages women quietly endure on a chronic basis without notice. And perhaps we can now see the mid-90s response to Bill Clinton’s own accusers — subdued or defensive among liberals on account of his women-friendly politics — as a near miss of an opportunity, a cultural shift that could have built on the momentum of Anita Hill, but never did."
Do you think that Trump's open admittance to sexual assault will give women a new way of seeing their own experiences going forward? Are Trump's actions the final straw in how our society views and quietly tolerates such horrific behavior? Should Kristian have chosen a less volatile article?
Source: http://www.nytimes.com/2016/10/14/magazine/after-donald-trump-will-more-women-believe-their-own-stories.html?hp&action=click&pgtype=Homepage&clickSource=story-heading&module=first-column-region®ion=top-news&WT.nav=top-news&_r=2
One of the largest blows to Donald Trump's campaign (and there were many blows) was the resurfacing of an eleven-year-old tape in which Trump "essentially admits he has a habit of sexually assaulting women." This brings the topic of sexual assault and the way in which we as a society address it into the political spectrum yet again. The article describes the wide-spread effects of Law Professor Anita Hill's testifying against Justice Clarence Thomas that he had sexually harassed her. It also cites the story of the many brave women who last year stepped forward to tell their stories of being sexually assaulted by Bill Cosby. Both events succeeded overwhelmingly in galvanizing women. If that were the case then, imagine now. "Perhaps Trump is the ultimate gift to feminists: a grabber and bragger who has focused the world’s attention on the outrages women quietly endure on a chronic basis without notice. And perhaps we can now see the mid-90s response to Bill Clinton’s own accusers — subdued or defensive among liberals on account of his women-friendly politics — as a near miss of an opportunity, a cultural shift that could have built on the momentum of Anita Hill, but never did."
Do you think that Trump's open admittance to sexual assault will give women a new way of seeing their own experiences going forward? Are Trump's actions the final straw in how our society views and quietly tolerates such horrific behavior? Should Kristian have chosen a less volatile article?
Source: http://www.nytimes.com/2016/10/14/magazine/after-donald-trump-will-more-women-believe-their-own-stories.html?hp&action=click&pgtype=Homepage&clickSource=story-heading&module=first-column-region®ion=top-news&WT.nav=top-news&_r=2
Erick Erickson: The G.O.P. After Donald Trump
Recently, many influential Republicans have made a mockery of themselves and their party by attempting to defend the Republican nominee and his actions on national television. As Erickson puts it, "free-trade advocates have become protectionists. Strategists are treating Drudge Report surveys as scientific endeavors while dismissing legitimate polls as Clintonian propaganda." As Trump's campaign collapses around him and election day looms ever closer, it begs the question: what will happen to the Republican party after Trump? What do you think should be the top priority for the Republican party in terms of reform? How will they win back disgruntled voters and party members who feel repulsed by the party's extremely conservative views?
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/10/14/opinion/erick-erickson-the-gop-after-donald-trump.html?_r=1
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/10/14/opinion/erick-erickson-the-gop-after-donald-trump.html?_r=1
Monday, October 10, 2016
What Story Did Debate Night Body Language Tell?
What Story Did Debate Night Body Language Tell?
When determining who won a debate, commentators often include body language as an aspect of their evaluation. In the second presidential debate, much was conveyed non-verbally. Donald Trump repeatedly stood behind and seemed to "stalk" Hillary Clinton, which has been described by a public speaking expert as his attempt to exert dominance over her. Trump's gripping of his chair and frequent fidgeting has been described as a way for him to convey power, and his facial expressions said to indicate he was very angry. Clinton looked down frequently, which could be interpreted as her acting defensively. Did you find either of the candidate's body language to be off-putting? How much of an effect do you think body language has on the public's perception of a candidate's performance?
Paul Ryan Won’t Defend Donald Trump, Upsetting Trump and G.O.P. Hard-Liners
Paul Ryan Won’t Defend Donald Trump, Upsetting Trump and G.O.P. Hard-Liners
On Monday, October 10, Republican House Speaker Paul Ryan informed Republican lawmakers that he will no longer defend Donald Trump or campaign with him. He will instead focus his efforts on retaining the GOP Senate and House majority. Donald Trump has sharply criticized Ryan's actions, saying Ryan shouldn't spend so much time attacking the Republican nominee. Ryan, the top Republican in Congress, is certainly very influential and his decision will undoubtedly have far-reaching implications for the Trump campaign and the future of the party. Do you believe Ryan made the right decision in distancing himself from the Trump campaign? Do you think he should completely rescind his endorsement of the embattled candidate? What do you think the consequences of Donald Trump's campaign will be for down-ballot Republicans?
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/10/11/us/politics/donald-trump-gop-hillary-clinton.html?_r=0
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/10/11/us/politics/donald-trump-gop-hillary-clinton.html?_r=0
Thursday, October 6, 2016
In country's most expensive Senate race, Pat Toomey, Katie McGinty each raise $5 million more
Another article from the Philadelphia Inquirer, this one examines the Senate race between Pat Toomey and Katie McGinty. They're spending ridiculous amounts of money on their campaigns, making it the most expensive Senate race in history at about $81 million. Although it's a short article, it's very concise and informative if you've been following the campaigns! Do you think the amount spent is absurd?
Kaine, Pence blast opposing running mates in VP debate
This article from the Philadelphia Inquirer and gives a good (and kind of liberal biased) summary of the Vice Presidential debate on Tuesday night. Although this article is very similar to Lauren's, it focuses more on how both Kaine and Pence didn't quite run the show. Both candidates seemed to talk over eachother and the moderator the whole time. I thought it was very interesting how Pence supposedly supports Trump but can't defend any of Trump's opinions.
Wednesday, October 5, 2016
Donald Trump’s Slip in Polls Has G.O.P. Worried About Congress
In recent polls, the ratings for Donald Trump have plummeted in crucial swing states. Republicans are worried that with Trump's support falling, their support will also fall, causing many of the Republican nominees for Congress to fail to be elected or reelected. This leads to the issue of whether the Republicans running for Congress should pull their support away from Trump. Some Republicans already have openly stated that they do not support Trump, but most have stayed silent, a strategy that may come back to hurt them if Clinton wins the election by a landslide. Do you think that it would be beneficial for the Republicans attempting to get elected to either openly support or not support Trump? Do you think it would make a difference at all? Why?
Tim Kaine and Mike Pence Clash Sharply Over Their Running Mates
The vice presidential debate was October 4, involving Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton's running mate, Senator Tim Kaine, and Republican nominee Donald Trump's running mate, Governor Mike Pence. Both Pence and Kaine addressed topics such as faith, insult-driven campaigns, and foreign affairs. Kaine, however, was on the offensive the entire night, addressing or rather attacking Donald Trump's various blunders and policies. Pence, however, took a more defensive approach, choosing to avoid addressing the attacks on Trump and making only a few attacks on Kaine's running mate, Hillary, while Kaine openly praised Hillary every chance he could get. What is your opinion on Pence's defensive approach versus Kaine's offensive one? Do you think the outcome of the vice presidential debate will have any lasting impact on the election?
Rather Than Responding, Pence Dodges Questions About Trump
In Tuesday night's vice presidential debate, Gov. Mike Pence and Sen. Tim Kaine went head to head for the first time to discuss their candidate's policies. This article focuses on how, rather than giving clear answers to questions about his running mate's, Donald Trump's, policies, Pence often deflected questions, choosing to change the topic and not answer questions directly. I found this interesting because Pence's behavior seems to be similar to Trump's when he was in the same position last week. (An interesting sidenote: I read that this year's VP debate had the lowest number of viewers since the one in 2000...)
Clinton Uses Trump's Voice in Ads Against Him
In her most recent ads, Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton uses clips of Donald Trump in order to paint a picture of a man who is unfit to be president. Supporters claim that these ads are effective because the viewer can relate to the people in them while others believe that the ads are ineffective and offensive. Have you seen Clinton's ads? Do you believe they are effective?
Wednesday, September 28, 2016
Mark Cuban slams Donald Trump: Not paying taxes is greedy, not ‘smart’
A fellow billionaire criticizes Republican nominee Donald Trump for not paying taxes. Telling him you can not just, "Take take take." Do you believe the upper class should be paying taxes just like everyone else? Does Trump's statement change your opinion of him, for better or for worse? Why?
Hillary Is Not the First Politician to Delete Their Emails
During George W. Bush's presidency he had "lost" 22 million emails. These emails were on private servers owned by the Republican National comittee, similar to how Hillary Clinton's emails were on private servers. Should George W. Bush be criticized as much as Hillary Clinton is now? Do you think we should ignore or not criticize Clinton as much because it is commonplace in Politics? Why or why not?
The Economics of Politics
This article discusses the relationship between Presidential terms and the market. The article argues that how the stock market is doing at any given time relies more on the overall economic trends than it does on who is in power. Does this change your view of past presidents who happened to be in power during times of prosperity or recession, such as Bill Clinton or Obama? Does it change your current view on the presidential debate- if who's in power doesn't matter to the economy as much as previously thought, would you change your preferred candidate? (Ex: Many people quote Trump's business acumen as a reason to vote for him).
The First Presedential Debate of the 2016 Election - Who Won?
After the first Presedential debate of the electoral season, most national news outlets view Hillary Clinton as the overwhelming winner in their post-debate polls. However, other news outlets used Internet polls and found the complete opposite results. Who do you think won the debate? Why?
Tuesday, September 27, 2016
The big fight over the Dakota Access Pipeline, explained
Although this article is a week old I found it very interesting and necessary to mention due to the lack of continuous mainstream news coverage on the Dakota Access Pipeline. It was late August/early September when I first heard about the pipeline and I was only reminded of it recently because I heard that things weren't going well for the environmentalists and the tribal groups who have been protesting the installation of the pipeline. This article touches on the efforts of the tribal groups and the environmentalist groups specifically concerned with the DAPL and moves on to the broader concern of pipelines in general and their access to large amounts of fossil fuels. Environmentalists don't want the fossil fuels tapped because they will obviously keep adding to the effects of global warming. How would you settle the diputes over projects like the DAPL? What do you think about the amount of fossil fuels that are consumed in America?
Here's where Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump stand on education
We are less than two months away from the election and have yet to hear a satisfactory amount about either candidate's plan for education. Both candidates share a support for charter schools although Clinton must tread lightly on this subject as not to offend the teachers' unions who are currently backing her. Clinton also supports the Common Core and wants "debt-free" college for all students from low-income families. However she opposes Trump's ideas on vouchers and school choice, fearing the damage it would do to public schools. Trump believes his voucher plan and removal of the Common Core will provide a more effective education to more students.
As a public school student does any part of either candidate's stance leave you feeling dissatisfied or uneasy? Do you want the candidates to elaborate on their stances on education in the upcoming debates?
As a public school student does any part of either candidate's stance leave you feeling dissatisfied or uneasy? Do you want the candidates to elaborate on their stances on education in the upcoming debates?
Hillary has mastered being a "Woman in Politics"
It seems that the best way for Hillary to use her gender card is to not mention it at all. During the debate, at no point did she try to use if to her advantage, and that made it so her opponent couldn't use it to her disadvantage. I know we are long past using appearances as a judge of someone's character, but she presented herself as a strong yet feminine figure. She didn't even mention Trump's lack of respect of women until close to the end. All in all, Hillary seems to be doing well in the gender department. When you look at this article, you'll read more about how gender is playing a big role in this election and how it affects the voters/candidates.
Lester Holt held back in his moderation
During the presidential debate on Monday night, it appeared as though Lester Holt refrained from asking the hard questions. He had a lot of room to control the course of the evening but oftentimes the candidates spoke over him or didn't answer his questions. Some are saying that him holding back helped us see the candidates characteristics since they were able to talk freely. Holt guided the discussion but seemed to be more lax of time restrictions and the direction that the debate headed. He asked direct questions to both candidates, though, and the questions seemed generally fair. Moderating a presidential debate is considered a very big deal for a journalist and it is up to (some more) debate to see whether Lester Holt did well or not.
Friday, September 23, 2016
Scary Story About Hacking
Hackers got access to emails detailing important security information about top officials including VP Biden, Hillary Clinton, and FLOTUS Michelle Obama.
Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton Prepare Differently for the Debate
Both candidates have a lot at stake in the first presidential debate, upcoming on Monday night. However, they are going about their preparations for the event quite differently.
Sunday, April 10, 2016
PA Senate Race
This is not a blog post that requires responses. As everyone should know, the Senate race in Pennsylvania is extremely important as it could help to determine whether the Senate is majority Democrat or Republican. The incumbent, Pat Toomey (Republican), is running unopposed in the Republican primary field. He will compete with the winner of the Democratic primary field. As of right now, the three Democrats fighting to be able to take on Toomey are John Fetterman, Katie Mcginty, and Joe Sestak. The link below will take you to a debate between the three Democratic candidates and also includes the bios of all four candidates.
http://wpsu.psu.edu/vote16/
http://wpsu.psu.edu/vote16/
Tuesday, March 15, 2016
Results So Far in the Primaries
Results So Far in the Primaries
This table shows the state-by-state results for all of the primaries and caucuses that have taken place so far this year. To win the primary nomination, the Republican candidate needs to win 1,237 delegates. Currently (as of March 15, before the day's results are all in) Donald Trump is in the lead with 469. In second is Ted Cruz, who has won 369 delegates. Then there's Marco Rubio and John Kasich with 163 and 63, respectively. The Democratic presidential nominee will need to win 2,383 delegates. Hilary Clinton is closer to that goal than Bernie Sanders; she's won 768 delegates, while Bernie's only won 554. Considering the results so far, do you think the Republican and Democratic presidential nominees are already set? If not, who do you think still has a chance at either nomination, and why? What do you expect to happen in the remaining primaries?
This table shows the state-by-state results for all of the primaries and caucuses that have taken place so far this year. To win the primary nomination, the Republican candidate needs to win 1,237 delegates. Currently (as of March 15, before the day's results are all in) Donald Trump is in the lead with 469. In second is Ted Cruz, who has won 369 delegates. Then there's Marco Rubio and John Kasich with 163 and 63, respectively. The Democratic presidential nominee will need to win 2,383 delegates. Hilary Clinton is closer to that goal than Bernie Sanders; she's won 768 delegates, while Bernie's only won 554. Considering the results so far, do you think the Republican and Democratic presidential nominees are already set? If not, who do you think still has a chance at either nomination, and why? What do you expect to happen in the remaining primaries?
Democrats and Republicans Surveyed After Voting on Super Tuesday 3
Democrats and Republicans Surveyed After Voting on Super Tuesday 3
Today (Tuesday, March 15) primary elections were held in Ohio, Florida, Illinois, North Carolina, and Missouri. CNN conducted exit polls to determine what both Democratic and Republican voters were thinking when they chose their candidates. Members of both parties said they were concerned about the state of the United States' economy and its economic future, but a greater proportion of Republicans responded this way than Democrats. Do you think their worries reflect on the values of the Republican Party, or on the Republican presidential candidates? Additionally, a larger percentage of Republicans than Democrats were "late-deciders," meaning they didn't know which candidate they would be voting for until recently. Again, how does this reflect on the Republican candidates? Does this show that Republican voters are disappointed with the their party?
Today (Tuesday, March 15) primary elections were held in Ohio, Florida, Illinois, North Carolina, and Missouri. CNN conducted exit polls to determine what both Democratic and Republican voters were thinking when they chose their candidates. Members of both parties said they were concerned about the state of the United States' economy and its economic future, but a greater proportion of Republicans responded this way than Democrats. Do you think their worries reflect on the values of the Republican Party, or on the Republican presidential candidates? Additionally, a larger percentage of Republicans than Democrats were "late-deciders," meaning they didn't know which candidate they would be voting for until recently. Again, how does this reflect on the Republican candidates? Does this show that Republican voters are disappointed with the their party?
Sunday, March 13, 2016
Why Bernie Sanders needs to start winning big states- big
While Bernie Sanders has fought a formidable race against frontrunner Hilary Clinton in this presidential race he is still falling behind her in national polls and delegates won. He needs to win some big states with a lot of delegates if he wants to catch up to her. Where do you think it is most likely that he will win and do you really thing he has a chance of ever beating her and becoming the democratic nominee?
Marco Rubio Wins D.C. GOP Convention
Marco Rubio after falling behind in the polls now is fourth in most national polls however this recent victory has possibly helped him to reestablish his image. Does Marco Rubio have a chance at this point or should he drop out due to low poll numbers. He is the Republican establishments first choice but right now that does not seem to be doing him any good.
Thursday, March 3, 2016
Joe Biden: The Senate’s Duty on a Supreme Court Nominee
In
this New York Times Op-Ed, Vice
President Joseph Biden outlines his experience in being involved in nominating
nine justices to the Supreme Court during his 36 years in the Senate. He
stresses that in each of these instances the nomination process adhered to the
Constitution. He feels strongly that the Constitution plainly states what politicians
need to do after Justice Scalia died. Biden is also saddened that the
opposition will not even consider a nominee until after the fall election. He sends
a plea to Republican leaders to “take a step back
and think about what they are doing.” He implores them to uphold the oath they have
taken as members of Congress, especially “if they love the Senate as much as I
do.” Do you think that Biden’s words will sway any Republicans to change their
minds? How do you predict this stalemate may end? How might the outcome of cases
that the present justices are deliberating on change now that Justice Scalia
has passed away?
Mitt Romney Calls Donald Trump 'A Phony, A Fraud'; Trump Hits Back
Mitt Romney is the latest Republican to criticize Donald Trump and question his fitness to be president. He called him a fraud, a phony, and a con artist. Romney also called into question Trump's economic plans, saying that his ideas to restore American jobs from offshore is "flimsy at best." In typical style, Trump retaliated soon after with name calling. He ridiculed Romney as a "choke artist." Trump also said that Romney ran "one of the worst campaigns in the history of politics." Do you think that Romney's stance will hurt Trump in the polls and the next primaries? Is Romney bucking to be a late-stage candidate? Is this a last ditch effort by the Stop Trump movement in the GOP establishment to set back Trump's momentum?
Wednesday, March 2, 2016
The Backlash Against Chris Christie
The Backlash Against Chris Christie
Poor poor Chris Christie. The one time esteemed governor of New Jersey has found himself in hot water again as he faces harsh criticism for endorsing Trump after speaking out against him for so long. His approval ratings have taken a dive and the GOP establishment has viciously attacked him. He most likely endorsed Trump out of the hope that he can become Trump's Vice President. Do you think Trump will pick him as a running mate? If so, was his endorsement worth it? If not, who do you think a trump might pick instead if he gets that far?
Poor poor Chris Christie. The one time esteemed governor of New Jersey has found himself in hot water again as he faces harsh criticism for endorsing Trump after speaking out against him for so long. His approval ratings have taken a dive and the GOP establishment has viciously attacked him. He most likely endorsed Trump out of the hope that he can become Trump's Vice President. Do you think Trump will pick him as a running mate? If so, was his endorsement worth it? If not, who do you think a trump might pick instead if he gets that far?
Growing Number Of GOP Politicians Refuse To Back Donald Trump In The General Election
Republicans from across the spectrum are speaking out against Trump and his growing potential for presidency. Trump is essentially dividing the GOP more and more with his popularity. As some Republicans are vowing to not support him, others are criticizing those turning their backs on their party if he is the nominee. Do you believe that party allegiance should play a role in who people support? Why or why not? The article mentions Chris Christie's recent backing of Trump. Do you think this has the potential to help or hurt Trump? Will his support have any effect? Lastly, in your opinion, what are some possible outcomes for the GOP if Trump gets the nomination. Do you think they will be able to keep their party together or are we witnessing the demise of the Republican Party?
Beneath Hillary Clinton’s Super Tuesday Wins, Signs of Turnout Trouble
Hilary Clinton, the front-runner for the Democratic Party, is having major trouble attracting voters to the primaries. Since 2008, Democratic turnout in some states has decreased by as much as 50%. This could be a major problem when it comes time to face off against the GOP. The article says she may not have enough support to beat out the Republican nominee because of the low voter turnout. Do you think there is a possibility of Clinton rallying more voters? Do you have any ideas as to what she could do to attract more votes? The article focuses heavily on Clinton, do you think that New York Times is discounting Bernie too soon? Does America still have the chance to FEEL THE BERN?
Anti- Trump Republicans Call for a Third Party Option
A small group of conservative leaders are calling for a third party option if Trump wins the Republican nomination. While Trump has gained momentous support, he has also alienated a large portion of the Republican Party. His failure to condemn white supremacist David Duke served as the tipping point for many. Foreign policy advisor to Marco Rubio, Max Boot, has said he would sooner vote for Hillary Clinton than he would for Trump. Some Republicans hope that an existing minority party such as the Libertarian Party or the Constitution Party will be able to nominate a candidate that could compete with Trump. Given the history of third party candidates, do you think there is any chance that one would be able to win the presidential election in 2016? Do you think the consequences of a Trump nomination could signal an end to the modern day republican Party?
4 Reasons Chris Christie Endorsed Donald Trump
Chris Christie's endorsement of Donald Trump came as an initial shock to many, but on a second glance it starts to make sense. This article goes on to describe several reasons why Christie would endorse Trump such as Christie being a political realist and wanting to be in the running for vice president. This endorsement has caused some backlash for Christie and prompted several articles describing Christie's "awkward" appearance while stumping for Trump. Do you think there are any other reasons for Christie endorsing Trump? How do you think a Trump/Christie White House would change the nature of American politics?
Tuesday, March 1, 2016
Paul Ryan, Mitch McConnell call out Trump on KKK
Paul Ryan, Mitch McConnell call out Trump on KKK
Speaker of the House Paul Ryan and Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell have both condemned Donald Trump's failure to speak out against David Duke and the Ku Klux Klan in reference to their support of him. However, Donald Trump has claimed that technical issues resulted in him not being able to hear what his interviewer was talking about when the issue was brought up. Do you think this controversy will hurt Donald Trump (either in the primaries or the general election)? Also, do you think that it makes a difference that Paul Ryan and Mitch McConnell have spoken out against Trump in this instance? Or does this just play to Trump's strength among those who see him as an "outsider"?
Speaker of the House Paul Ryan and Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell have both condemned Donald Trump's failure to speak out against David Duke and the Ku Klux Klan in reference to their support of him. However, Donald Trump has claimed that technical issues resulted in him not being able to hear what his interviewer was talking about when the issue was brought up. Do you think this controversy will hurt Donald Trump (either in the primaries or the general election)? Also, do you think that it makes a difference that Paul Ryan and Mitch McConnell have spoken out against Trump in this instance? Or does this just play to Trump's strength among those who see him as an "outsider"?
Wednesday, February 24, 2016
Cruz Under Fire
Cruz Under Fire
Ted Cruz has been taking some heat recently from some of his biggest campaign supporters. Many of Cruz's backers are angry at Cruz for not being aggressive enough. They think the reason that he's not been winning the race for the republican nomination is the fact that he's not being the "crusader against Washington" that he is. They think that he's not being aggressive enough towards the current government, which is why Trump has been so successful, and they think that he's not been aggressive enough in directly countering Trump himself. Another issue that Cruz's supporters are concerned about is that fact that he has been so far unable to neutralize Marco Rubio and turn the republican primary into a two-man race. Do you think Cruz has a chance at the nomination? What should Cruz change if he wants to see success similar to that of Trump's?
Ted Cruz has been taking some heat recently from some of his biggest campaign supporters. Many of Cruz's backers are angry at Cruz for not being aggressive enough. They think the reason that he's not been winning the race for the republican nomination is the fact that he's not being the "crusader against Washington" that he is. They think that he's not being aggressive enough towards the current government, which is why Trump has been so successful, and they think that he's not been aggressive enough in directly countering Trump himself. Another issue that Cruz's supporters are concerned about is that fact that he has been so far unable to neutralize Marco Rubio and turn the republican primary into a two-man race. Do you think Cruz has a chance at the nomination? What should Cruz change if he wants to see success similar to that of Trump's?
Trump wins Nevada
Trump Wins Nevada
Donald Trump recently won the Nevada caucus by a wide margin. He continued his trend of blowing out the rest of the republican competition, carrying 46% of the delegates. Trump has been utilizing the anger shared by many young voters, especially republicans, to rally support and secure more votes. He's somewhat of a political outsider and his views are radical, so its been a surprise that he's been as successful as he has been. At this point, as much as GOP dislikes him, it's hard to see an outcome that doesn't involve Trump winning the republican nomination. Rubio and Cruz virtually tied for second in Nevada; however, it looks less and less like either of the two can be considered as plausible winners of the primary. Do you think that Trump should win the nomination? Why do you think Trump has been so successful in his campaign even given his radical ideology and lack of political experience.
Donald Trump recently won the Nevada caucus by a wide margin. He continued his trend of blowing out the rest of the republican competition, carrying 46% of the delegates. Trump has been utilizing the anger shared by many young voters, especially republicans, to rally support and secure more votes. He's somewhat of a political outsider and his views are radical, so its been a surprise that he's been as successful as he has been. At this point, as much as GOP dislikes him, it's hard to see an outcome that doesn't involve Trump winning the republican nomination. Rubio and Cruz virtually tied for second in Nevada; however, it looks less and less like either of the two can be considered as plausible winners of the primary. Do you think that Trump should win the nomination? Why do you think Trump has been so successful in his campaign even given his radical ideology and lack of political experience.
Monday, February 22, 2016
Why Sandy Hook Parents are Suing a Gunmaker
Why Sandy Hook Parents are Suing a Gunmaker
In December 2012, Sandy Hook Elementary School experienced a shooting that would change the lives of families and community members forever. 26 people (six were adults, twenty children) were killed by gunman Adam Lanza, and the parents of the deceased are now fighting to sue gun distributing company Remington, who manufactured and sold the used firearm. The company argues the 2005 federal law, The Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act, protects them, because it says the gun manufacturers are granted immunity "from any lawsuit related to injuries that result from criminal misuse of the product". Parents argue back the loophole of "negligent entrustment", which says that one party can be held liable for negligence because they negligently provided another party with a dangerous instrument. Remington never came in contact with the shooter when selling, so families are pointing that to be negligent. What do you think the verdict of this lawsuit will be? Do you think the Sandy Hook families are stretching it with their accusals towards Remington, or should the gun company be held responsible?
In December 2012, Sandy Hook Elementary School experienced a shooting that would change the lives of families and community members forever. 26 people (six were adults, twenty children) were killed by gunman Adam Lanza, and the parents of the deceased are now fighting to sue gun distributing company Remington, who manufactured and sold the used firearm. The company argues the 2005 federal law, The Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act, protects them, because it says the gun manufacturers are granted immunity "from any lawsuit related to injuries that result from criminal misuse of the product". Parents argue back the loophole of "negligent entrustment", which says that one party can be held liable for negligence because they negligently provided another party with a dangerous instrument. Remington never came in contact with the shooter when selling, so families are pointing that to be negligent. What do you think the verdict of this lawsuit will be? Do you think the Sandy Hook families are stretching it with their accusals towards Remington, or should the gun company be held responsible?
Jeb Bush's Doomed Campaign
Jeb Bush's Doomed Campaign
Now former US Presidential Candidate Jeb Bush has dropped out of the race, after admitting that 2016 was "simply not his year". He had shown poor results in polls over the past few months, but the New Hampshire primary had him coming in fourth and beating Marco Rubio- an encouraging triumph, but it wasn't enough to save his campaign. When Bush started to realize he wasn't going to be as big as he'd originally planned, he claimed "slow and steady wins the race", and was even known to hand out toy turtles to kids. Slow and steady didn't do it for Jeb, and we never would have anticipated this a year ago when Bush was an anticipated GOP front runner. What do you think killed his candidacy? Or was it doomed to begin with? Do you think his association with the Bush family had anything to do with it, even though Jeb stated several times during his campaign, "I am my own man"?
Now former US Presidential Candidate Jeb Bush has dropped out of the race, after admitting that 2016 was "simply not his year". He had shown poor results in polls over the past few months, but the New Hampshire primary had him coming in fourth and beating Marco Rubio- an encouraging triumph, but it wasn't enough to save his campaign. When Bush started to realize he wasn't going to be as big as he'd originally planned, he claimed "slow and steady wins the race", and was even known to hand out toy turtles to kids. Slow and steady didn't do it for Jeb, and we never would have anticipated this a year ago when Bush was an anticipated GOP front runner. What do you think killed his candidacy? Or was it doomed to begin with? Do you think his association with the Bush family had anything to do with it, even though Jeb stated several times during his campaign, "I am my own man"?
Friday, February 19, 2016
Pope Says Trump 'Not Christian' in a Sign of Global Concern
Pope Francis made headlines yesterday after he criticized Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump, calling Trump's position on immigration "not Christian." Trump then responded, saying that Pope Francis was "disgraceful" for questioning his faith. Trump has previously said that Mexico sends rapists and drug-runners in the United States and promises to build a wall to keep said people out of the country, at the expense of the Mexican government. Many have questioned if the Pope's comments will prove to be damaging or beneficial to Trump's campaign. 71 percent of Americans identify as Christian today, so they might side with the Pope. Do you think what the Pope said will hurt or help Trump? Also, do you think it was justified for the Pope to say what he said?
Scalia’s Death Offers Best Chance in a Generation to Reshape Supreme Court
With the recent passing of Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia, an opening in the supreme court has presented itself. The court now has four conservative justices and four liberal justices, meaning whoever the president nominates could determine if the court is held by a majority of liberal or conservative justices. The Supreme Court has been controlled by conservatives for several decades, and now Obama has a real chance of changing that, stating that, "The court is now divided on many issues. This would be a deciding vote." If a liberal justice joins the Supreme Court, it could make a huge difference in cases like Citizens United, which passed with a 5-4 vote. This would also help to shape cases like abortion laws and gun rights in the future. Many experts, however have pointed out that any change will be gradual. This is a huge decision for Obama, and further complicates the current presidential race. Do you think that the Obama will choose to nominate a moderate or a liberal judge. Also, do you think that the Senate will decline his nomination, should he nominate someone liberal?
Thursday, February 18, 2016
White House Chides Schumer for Protest of Counterterrorism Cuts
Senator Chuck Schumer of New York recently drew criticism from the Obama Administration for complaining about cuts to the security budget for the state's urban areas. These cuts come after much of the Homeland Security grants given to the state over past few years went unspent. Schumer, however, argues that the funds should still remain available even if most of the money is not spent. Do you think the threat of terrorism and other hostile activities is real enough to warrant this type of increased funding? Do you agree with Senator Schumer or the Obama Administration? Is there such a thing as too little spending when safety is on the line? Conversely, how much spending is too much for this type of issue?
Chinese Missiles in South China Sea Underscore a Growing Conflict Risk
With China's recent attempt to increase its military influence by positioning surface-to-air missiles on a disputed island in the South China Sea, much concern is being raised over the nature of the nation's intents. These actions come at an especially inopportune time, as President Obama has recently attempted to bolster American influence in the region. This raises the concern that China is attempting to warn off the Americans in a hostile manner. Do you think the Chinese should be trying to send their message in this way? Should President Obama adhere to their warning? What do you think this means for countries like Vietnam and the Philippines, who are both vehemently resisting Chinese expansion this area, and who would be opposed the hostile takeover of such an island?
Wednesday, February 17, 2016
Clinton Versus Sanders: The Rift Between Older And Younger Black Voters
As the primary process continues, the candidates are finding themselves in less ethically homologous states. The South Carolina primary, "a primary in which black voters regularly make up half or more of the electorate" nears and Sanders is "working to convince black voters who have known the Clintons for years, if not decades, to support him and not Hillary Clinton." There is a much larger support for Clinton among the African American vote, especially in these southern states. In many ways they feel that Clinton is more experienced, has represented a large African American constituency in the past, and would be a continuation of the Obama administration whose "approval rating with black voters regularly hovers over 90 percent." Sanders, whose career started in the civil rights movement, regularly talks about criminal justice reform and the needs of African Americans in his stump speech. He has also been endorsed or he works with many prominent figures in the African American community. Regardless, many are seeing this fight as only a positive thing for the community. How do you think the African American vote will play a role in the coming election and then policy going forward?
Apple, The FBI And iPhone Encryption: A Look At What's At Stake
Last December, Syed Farook and Tashfeen Malik attacked the Inland Regional Center in San Bernardino, Calif., where they later lost their lives in a police shootout. During their investigation the FBI recovered a iPhone 5c used by Syed Farook. This iteration of iPhone has multiple security features, including an encryption of all outgoing data making the phone "uncrackable" unless you have it physically and you have the security PIN. This pin is also protected by "an auto-erase function that deletes a phone's content after 10 incorrect passcode entries, a mandatory delay between entering passcodes after a certain number of failed attempts, and the requirement that passcodes be entered manually instead of being quickly plugged in by a computer." This prohibits the FBI from cracking what would be a 30 minutes worth of computer guess and check. Because of this the FBI requested and then court ordered Apple to create a program to enter the iPhone and disable these security features so the iPhone can be opened and the data kept on it. Apple greatly resisted this, citing a fundamental right to personal privacy. We have studied in class the uneasy relationship between national security and personal freedom. How do you think Apple should act? Are they right or do they need to create this program that could be used on every iPhone the FBI needs to get into?
Tuesday, February 16, 2016
5 Ways Scalia's Death Complicates The 2016 Election
After the death of former Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia, there has been a lot of uproar and debate over who Obama will nominate for his replacement and whether or not the nomination will be accepted or not by the Senate. But how does this factor into the upcoming election? Will the nomination ordeal aid the Democratic Party or hurt them in the general election? What about primaries? Will it increase voter turnout this election?
Jeb Bush Adds a Weapon (His Brother) Despite Worries It Could Misfire
One of the biggest campaign strategies is having celebrities and well-known figures endorse a candidate. A few days ago, Jeb Bush's campaign had a special guest: his brother, former president George W. Bush. Reporters and politician commentators are divided on whether this a good stately or not. Do you think the strategy will help Jeb Bush get votes and/or gain popularity in the polls? Why or why not? Is there anything in it for President George W. Bush? Is the reminder of the Bush legacy a good thing or a bad thing for Jeb Bush's campaign?
Monday, February 15, 2016
Justice Antonin Scalia's death quickly sparks political battle
Following the death of Supreme Court Justice Scalia, Republican and Democratic leaders must decide whether President Obama or the next president will nominate the next justice. Obama said the would nominate the next successor, but Republican Senate Majority Leader McConnell said the next president should make the decision. However, Senate Minority Leader Reid argued that the President should send a nominee right away. Do you think President Obama should send a nominee, or should they wait a year for the next president to take office? If they do wait, how do you think this will effect the Supreme Court and its decisions?
Wednesday, February 10, 2016
How the outsiders won -- and the insiders crumbled
The New Hampshire primary is over, with Bernie Sanders and Donald Trump winning their respective races by large margins. While Sanders is not technically an "outsider," he was seen as a fringe candidate until only recently. Most saw Donald Trump as a fringe candidate when he first announced his candidacy as well, but he is now the clear front runner. What about both of these candidates' platforms makes them appeal to voters (albeit extremely different voters)? Do you think their momentum will continue throughout the primaries?
Tuesday, February 9, 2016
Judge Handling Clinton Email Case Fumes Over State Department Delays
Judge Handling Clinton Email Case Fumes Over State Department Delays
A State Department lawyer has failed to produce emails in the Hillary Clinton email case - and this is not the first deadline that was missed. The lawyer was unable to give a detailed excuse for missing these deadlines. Because of the ongoing primary elections, it is critical that the case keeps proceeding, as it could have great sway in Democratic nomination.
What effect do you think Clinton's campaign has on the ongoing investigation? How will the investigation affect her campaign as it continues on? What consequences could the investigation, especially if she is found in the wrong, have on the candidate's potential future as president of the United States?
A State Department lawyer has failed to produce emails in the Hillary Clinton email case - and this is not the first deadline that was missed. The lawyer was unable to give a detailed excuse for missing these deadlines. Because of the ongoing primary elections, it is critical that the case keeps proceeding, as it could have great sway in Democratic nomination.
What effect do you think Clinton's campaign has on the ongoing investigation? How will the investigation affect her campaign as it continues on? What consequences could the investigation, especially if she is found in the wrong, have on the candidate's potential future as president of the United States?
North Korea Nuclear Effort Seen as a Top Threat to the U.S.
North Korea Nuclear Effort Seen as a Top Threat to the U.S.
National intelligence director James Clapper reported North Korea as the United States' biggest threat regarding nuclear weapons - a title previously held by Iran. Though Washington has not forgotten Iran, as it does pose a variety of other problems, North Korea's recent testing of nuclear weapons and launching a satellite leaves us to worry about their capability to launch an attack. With the United States government struggling to control North Korea's government, Obama has persuaded Chinese president Xi Jinping to use its own influence to rein in North Korea. Thus far, the US has taken action by moving to install an air defense system for South Korea - an act which could upset the Chinese government. What more could the US government do, if anything, to address the situation? As North Korea has been testing nuclear weapons illegally for years, it seems that there is little that will keep them under control. Should the government act more directly, before the threat becomes a reality? Or should we instead take a more passive approach?
National intelligence director James Clapper reported North Korea as the United States' biggest threat regarding nuclear weapons - a title previously held by Iran. Though Washington has not forgotten Iran, as it does pose a variety of other problems, North Korea's recent testing of nuclear weapons and launching a satellite leaves us to worry about their capability to launch an attack. With the United States government struggling to control North Korea's government, Obama has persuaded Chinese president Xi Jinping to use its own influence to rein in North Korea. Thus far, the US has taken action by moving to install an air defense system for South Korea - an act which could upset the Chinese government. What more could the US government do, if anything, to address the situation? As North Korea has been testing nuclear weapons illegally for years, it seems that there is little that will keep them under control. Should the government act more directly, before the threat becomes a reality? Or should we instead take a more passive approach?
Obama’s Last Budget, and Last Budget Battle With Congress
On Tuesday, Obama sent the last budget proposal of his administration to Congress. The budget asks for over $4 trillion for the fiscal year 2017 (starting October 1st). Due primarily to a rise in entitlement eligibility and a December tax cut, the 2017 deficit is predicted to increase to $616 billion from $438 billion last year. This deficit will be approximately 3.3 percent of the country's GDP; economists say that a deficit below 3 percent of a country's GDP is necessary for "economic prosperity." What do you think about the predicted deficit? Do we need to scale back entitlements and/or other government programs to reduce it? Or should we raise taxes to pay for the increase in the number of people eligible for social security?
In cybersecurity bid, Obama wants to retire outdated government systems
With all of the recent breaches of the federal government's computer and data systems, Obama has signed an executive order to ensure that all branches are using the most secure practices to protect the government data. In Obama's annual budget proposal, he included $19 billion for updating cybersecurity for the federal government, but GOP lawmakers are wary of supporting the new budget proposal. Do you think that much should be spent on improving cybersecurity, or are there more important issues to spend the money on? Do you think the GOP lawmakers don't agree with the budget because they are making it an issue between the parties, or do you think they really don't approve of how much he wants to spend?
Tuesday, January 19, 2016
Supreme Court to Hear Challenge to Obama Immigration Actions
Supreme Court to Hear Challenge to Obama Immigration Actions
The Supreme Court is considering legal challege to President Obama's overhual of the nation's immigration laws. This has been his most far reaching executive action since his election in 2008. Many adversaries of President Obama feel he is abusing his authority while others feel he has done nothing to overstep his authority. Do you feel President Obama has overstepped his authority with his immigration laws? How do you think the Supreme Court case will turn out? Could this affect the balance of power between Congress and the president?
The Supreme Court is considering legal challege to President Obama's overhual of the nation's immigration laws. This has been his most far reaching executive action since his election in 2008. Many adversaries of President Obama feel he is abusing his authority while others feel he has done nothing to overstep his authority. Do you feel President Obama has overstepped his authority with his immigration laws? How do you think the Supreme Court case will turn out? Could this affect the balance of power between Congress and the president?
Sarah Palin Endorses Donald Trump
Sarah Palin Endorses Donald Trump
Donald Trump has recieved an endorsement that could greatly increase his support in some conservative states. Sarah Palin, the 2008 GOP vice-presidential candidate, has endorsed Trump. This could lead to increased support for Donald Trump as we near the primaries. Palin's endorsement is the highest-profile backing of a republican candidate so far. Do you think Palin's endorsement will increase support for Trump? Will it have no affect? Could it even reduce support for Trump?
Donald Trump has recieved an endorsement that could greatly increase his support in some conservative states. Sarah Palin, the 2008 GOP vice-presidential candidate, has endorsed Trump. This could lead to increased support for Donald Trump as we near the primaries. Palin's endorsement is the highest-profile backing of a republican candidate so far. Do you think Palin's endorsement will increase support for Trump? Will it have no affect? Could it even reduce support for Trump?
Wednesday, January 6, 2016
Sander's Campaign Takes In $33 Million During Final Quarter
Democratic candidate Bernie Sanders has raised an impressive
thirty three million dollars in the last three months of campaigning. All of
this, in the spirit of his campaign, has been without the aid of SUPERPACS and
by keeping a monetary cap on the amount any one voter can donate. This is
largely in contrast to the manner in which the other candidates have raised their funds. With some of the
other candidates receiving donations in the ten million dollar range, what does
this landmark fundraising achievement reveal? Do you think that the Citizens
United case allowing such high amounts of donations from any single party
should be upheld?
G.O.P. Presidential Hopefuls Gird for a Month of Mud-Flinging
Working their ways into January, the GOP candidates have
begun putting their helmets on for what is expected to be an aggressive
campaign battleground. With a large amount of them still in the race and
February fast approaching, each of the candidates intends on making sure they
are the last man standing. The article states that "by month’s end, the
candidates and their allied groups could spend as much as $100 million
combined, much of it on negative advertising delivered via television, radio,
mailers and digital spots." While many of these candidates are skeptical
of Trump's front-running poll numbers, the belief that, "spending money
against Mr. Trump and inviting his wrath could only help another hopeful"
seems to have created a sort of nonaggression pact towards him. Who do you
think will benefit from this upcoming series of attacks? Will they increase the
chances of having a challenger that trumps Trump? Or conversely will they feed
into his support? In the 2016 race as well as in general, how does the nature
of attacks on other candidates affect the race as a whole?
Bipartisan Criminal Justice Overhaul Is Haunted by Willie Horton
A popular bipartisan criminal justice overhaul is currently up in the air in Congress. The overhaul would lead to the early release of thousands of nonviolent offenders. Many influential members of Congress from both the Democratic and Republican parties support the overhaul, but it is still facing opposition. This is because of an event that occurred after the release of Willie Horton on a weekend pass. Shortly after leaving the prison, Horton committed a brutal home invasion and rape that sent him back to prison. Many lawmakers are wary of this overhaul as they do not wish to see a repeat of this event. What do you think of the efforts to promote the overhaul? Should politicians still be cautious or is this the time to act?
Bernie Sanders Attacks Hillary Clinton Over Regulating Wall Street
Senator Bernie Sanders visited New York City's Town Hall and made his case to break up "too big to fail" commercial banks. He pointedly attacked Hillary Clinton for being too lax with her plan to regulate Wall Street. Sanders says that Congress should be the one regulating Wall Street and not the other way around. He claims that banks need to stop taking advantage of poorer Americans who need more affordable banking options and that he would allow post offices to engage in basic banking services to fix this issue. Clinton pushed back on Sander's statements arguing that she was tougher on the shadow banking sector and that she has a broader, more comprehensive set of policies for Wall Street What do you think of Sanders' proposals? Is his plan too extreme? What of Clinton's proposals, are her plans for Wall Street too weak or too tough?
Tuesday, January 5, 2016
Presidential candidates are getting their campaign ads ready for the first primaries
Voting in Iowa and New Hampshire is only a couple of weeks away. Watch some of the ads that opponents are throwing at each other in order to possibly get ahead in the wake of many opponents. What do you think of some of these ads? Do you think they will help some of these candidates get further in the poles or is it futile? Are any of the ads appealing to you in any ways? And how is it relative to what we have been learning lately about campaigning.?
President Obama has emotional call on limiting gun violence
President Obama had a very emotional and passionate meeting on gun violence. There were people affected by gun violence in attendance that he recognized, including former congresswoman Gabby Giffords. The President made it clear that there must be expanded background checks for gun buyers. What's your reaction to Obama's ideas and his emotions? Do you think it was appropriate? Obama also made it clear about what he thought of those opposing the bill. What do you think about the reaction of those agreeing and those opposing Obama? Are you surprised? And what are you're overall thoughts on the President's possible executive action on limiting Gun Control?
Bill Clinton: GOP 2016 field 'kind of scary’
As part of Candidate Hillary Clinton’s campaign, former President Bill Clinton is delivering speeches on her behalf. In his first speech in New Hampshire, he first described his emotional connections toward Hillary. As his speech continued, he labeled the entire field of GOP presidential candidates as “kind of scary.” Is President Clinton’s statement accurate? Why or why not?
GOP field wants no part of Oregon standoff
A group of armed protestors, led by Cliven Bundy, took control of the Masher National Wildlife Refuge building near Burns, Oregon, and will not leave and wants the government to hand over land resources. Conservatives who are sympathetic to their cause have openly criticized these protestors, such as Marco Rubio calling them “lawless.” Conservative sympathy arrives in the belief that there is too much federal control over land. Are these protestors entirely unreasonable in their demands? Is the reaction of conservatives surprising?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)